I Want a Premium Petrichor-Inspired Attar for Personal Wear — Which Earthy, Mineral or Green Fragrance Profiles Should I Compare?

I Want a Premium Petrichor-Inspired Attar for Personal Wear — Which Earthy, Mineral or Green Fragrance Profiles Should I Compare?

★ ★ SOSA makes no petrichor attar, no wet-earth composition and nothing of the kind, so the brief this page builds is for somebody else to read and the ceiling row in it is zeroWhat you get instead: a brief with eight rows, written in the only language a seller can act on, including the substrate and the minute of the eventMy recommendation on this page is ₹0 · nothing in the range answers a single row of the brief, and I say so before you start filling it in
★ SOSA Attars — Verified Buyer Reviews
Readers assembling a brief for a smell they can describe perfectly, who deserve to know before the first row that the honest ceiling from this range is zero
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★★★★★
"Our old water diffuser couldn't fill the living-dining. This one does the whole floor and you can't hear it running."
Homeowner Hyderabad
SOSA Vaayu · large home
★★★★★
"The app scheduling is the best part - strong in the mornings, gentle in the evening. Clinic feels calm all day."
Clinic Pune
SOSA Vaayu · wellness studio
★★★★★
"Paired it with the SOSA hotel oils. The projection is genuinely lobby-strength - nothing like a plug-in."
Office Manager Delhi
SOSA Vaayu · workspace
★★★★★
"My reception now smells like a five-star lobby. Guests comment on it before they even reach the desk."
Boutique Hotel Jaipur
SOSA Vaayu · lobby scenting
★★★★★
"Zero dampness, which was my worry in monsoon. The mist is completely dry and the scent carries across the whole salon."
Salon Owner Mumbai
SOSA Vaayu · spa & salon
★★★★★
"Set the timer once and forgot about it. Runs only during store hours, refills last weeks. Exactly what I wanted."
Retail Brand Bengaluru
SOSA Vaayu · showroom
★★★★★
"Our old water diffuser couldn't fill the living-dining. This one does the whole floor and you can't hear it running."
Homeowner Hyderabad
SOSA Vaayu · large home
★★★★★
"The app scheduling is the best part - strong in the mornings, gentle in the evening. Clinic feels calm all day."
Clinic Pune
SOSA Vaayu · wellness studio
★★★★★
"Paired it with the SOSA hotel oils. The projection is genuinely lobby-strength - nothing like a plug-in."
Office Manager Delhi
SOSA Vaayu · workspace
★★★★★
"My reception now smells like a five-star lobby. Guests comment on it before they even reach the desk."
Boutique Hotel Jaipur
SOSA Vaayu · lobby scenting
★★★★★
"Zero dampness, which was my worry in monsoon. The mist is completely dry and the scent carries across the whole salon."
Salon Owner Mumbai
SOSA Vaayu · spa & salon
★★★★★
"Set the timer once and forgot about it. Runs only during store hours, refills last weeks. Exactly what I wanted."
Retail Brand Bengaluru
SOSA Vaayu · showroom
★ Separate the four substrates before row one ₹0 Send Sonal your filled-in brief for a straight answer ₹0
★ No shop row on this page: a brief nothing in my range can answer has no business ending at a basket of mine

✓ The brief's own ceiling row states that the honest figure from SOSA is zero, because no row of it is answerable from the range ✓ No SOSA composition is offered on this page as a partial answer to any row, at any size and at any price ✓ No grade, origin certificate or oil percentage is claimed for any SOSA material here, because SOSA publishes none

Founder Diaries · Scent Memories · Flowers, Rain, Earth, Forests
By Sonal Sahani · ISIPCA Versailles 20 min read Updated October 2026
Before you fill in a single row: SOSA makes no petrichor attar, no wet-earth composition and nothing that behaves like one, so the brief this page builds is for another maker to read and my own entry in its last row is ₹0. I am saying that first because the worst thing a page like this can do is walk a reader through eight thoughtful questions and then produce a product link at the bottom. There is no product link at the bottom. What there is instead is the one artefact this family can honestly produce: a written brief, in the language a seller can actually act on, that you can send to whoever you end up buying from and that will get you a straight yes or no in a sentence rather than a catalogue. Including the row almost everybody leaves out, which is the time of day - because the first ten minutes of rain and an evening of rain are two completely different smells.
Quick answers — read this first
What should a brief for a wet-earth fragrance actually contain? Eight things, and only two of them are adjectives. The surface - earth, stone, leaves or wood. The season. The minute of the event, which matters more here than in any other fragrance brief. What was growing or standing within arm's reach. The three things that must be absent. Where and how you will wear it. The format you want. And a price ceiling. A seller can answer that in one line. A seller handed a memory cannot answer it at all.

Why does the time of day matter so much for a wet-earth brief? Because this smell is a sequence rather than a state. The release from wetted ground peaks in the first few minutes and then flattens as the surface saturates, so a reader remembering the first ten minutes of a shower and a reader remembering an evening of steady rain are describing two different smells - the first mineral and lifted, the second mostly wet vegetation and wet wood. A brief that omits the row is unusable, because the two answers point at different products.

Will this brief end in a SOSA product? No, and I would rather say so before you start than after. There is nothing in the four attars or the six perfume oils that answers any row of this brief - no soil, no clay, no dust, no rain, no wet stone. The ceiling row on my own form reads zero. The brief is still worth building, because it is the thing that gets you a straight answer from the makers who do work in this material.
The short answer
Short answer: Build the brief in eight rows and send it to a person rather than a search box. The rows that do the work are the substrate - earth, stone, damp leaves or rain-soaked wood - and the minute of the event, because wet-ground smell is a sequence that peaks and fades rather than a fixed state. Then the season, what was within arm's reach, the exclusions, the wearing context, the format and the ceiling. Eight short answers turn an unanswerable memory into something a maker can say yes or no to in one line.
The pick: ₹0, and the ceiling row of the brief says so on my behalf. No row here is answerable from the SOSA range, and the brief is built for you to take elsewhere. That is the honest output of this page and it is the only one I have.
Next step: settle row one first on the four-substrate page, because a brief that says earth when it means stone will be answered accurately and uselessly. If row one turns out to be earth, the translation page gives you the five material names that row needs. Then send the filled-in brief to me and I will tell you which rows anybody can answer.
In this guide
What I do not make, said plainly
SOSA makes no petrichor attar, no wet-earth composition and nothing of soil, clay, dust, rain or wet stone. Which is why this page produces a document rather than a recommendation, and why the ceiling row of the brief below reads ₹0 in my case. I am not going to put a sandalwood, a vetiver or a marine composition forward as a partial answer to any row, because a partial answer to a brief like this is how readers end up with four bottles and no memory. Said once, before the first row, and now the useful part.
Straight answer
Which earthy, mineral or green fragrance profiles should I compare if I want a premium petrichor-inspired attar for personal wear?
None from me, and the comparison you are proposing to run is the wrong instrument - what you need first is a brief, because a comparison between profiles cannot be scored until somebody has written down what is being compared against. First, why a brief rather than a shortlist. Readers arrive at this question wanting to compare three or four profiles against each other, which is a reasonable instinct and produces nothing, because the profiles are not competing on a single axis. A mineral composition and a green composition are not two strengths of one thing; they answer different memories, and without a written statement of the memory there is no criterion by which either could win. A brief supplies the criterion. Once the criterion is on paper the comparison takes about ten minutes and usually eliminates most of the shortlist, which is the point. Second, the two rows that do most of the work. The substrate row comes first because it is the one readers have never been asked: were you standing on open ground, on stone, on fallen leaves or beside wet timber. Those are four different smells, they are bought with four different search terms, and a brief that names the wrong one will be answered accurately and uselessly by every seller you send it to. The second is the minute of the event, which is particular to this material and which I will come back to at length further down the page, because getting it wrong is the commonest way a careful reader ends up with a careful disappointment. Third, the rows that look like filler and are not. What was growing or standing within arm's reach sounds like sentiment and is actually chemistry: the mineral half of a wet-ground smell is the local geology and the organic half is whatever was lying on that ground, so a lane with neem overhead, a garden bed with wet marigold stems in it and a bare cricket pitch produce three different smells from identical rain. The exclusions row is the one that saves money, because a brief phrased as what must be absent is checkable against a note list in seconds while a brief phrased as what must be present is not. And the format row matters more than readers expect: an oil attar is a skin scent that lives close for the hours it occupies, which is a different proposition from a spray and a completely different proposition from something you want in a room. Fourth, the last row, which is mine and reads zero. Every brief should carry a ceiling, and every ceiling should be stated before shopping rather than discovered during it. What is unusual about this brief is that the honest ceiling from my own range is not a number with a rupee sign in front of it. It is zero, because no row is answerable from the four attars or the six perfume oils, and a ceiling of ₹379 would imply that spending ₹379 here could get you some fraction of the brief. It cannot get you any fraction of it. I would rather write that into the form than leave the row blank and let a reader assume. Fifth, what to do with the brief once it exists, which is the part that produces results. Send it to people rather than to search engines. A maker who works in this material can read eight rows and reply in one sentence - yes, that is roughly what I make, or no, I make the other half of that, or nobody makes the thing in row three. An index cannot do any of that; it can only return products that share adjectives with your brief, and in this category the adjectives are shared by four unrelated smells. Three emails with a brief attached will teach you more about what exists than a fortnight of browsing, and they will cost you nothing but the writing. And last, the expectation I would set before you begin. A properly filled-in brief in this family quite often concludes that nothing available answers it, and that is a result rather than a failure. The rows are not there to be satisfied; they are there to be tested, and a brief that eliminates eleven products and leaves none standing has done its job and saved you eleven purchases. Readers who treat the exercise as a funnel towards a bottle will be frustrated. Readers who treat it as a filter will be relieved, and some of them will come back in two years when they meet the real thing in somebody's front room and recognise it immediately, because they will know exactly what they were looking for.

The brief itself, with every row and what it decides

Eight rows. The middle column says what each one changes, so you can see why it is being asked rather than filling it in on trust. The third column is yours and it is empty on purpose - only you hold these answers, which is the whole reason this page is a form rather than a recommendation.

The wet-ground brief
Eight rows, written so that a maker can answer them in one line rather than with a catalogue
The question Why it changes the answer Yours
Row 1. The surface. Open ground, stone, fallen leaves or wet timber - and if two apply, say which was underfoot This is the single highest-value row and almost nobody is asked it. The four are different smells with different sources and different search terms, and they sit at different heights in a composition, so naming the wrong one gets you accurate answers to a question you did not ask —
Row 2. The minute of the event. The first ten minutes of a shower, an hour in, or an evening of steady rain Wet-ground smell is a sequence rather than a state: the release peaks early and flattens as the surface saturates. The first ten minutes is mineral and lifted; the evening is mostly wet vegetation and wet wood. Two different products, and this row decides which —
Row 3. The season and the dryness before it. First rain after months of dry, or a shower in the middle of the monsoon The dry half of the smell is dust that accumulated while it was not raining, so a first shower after a long dry spell is a far dustier, more mineral event than the same rain in August. Readers who say monsoon and mean June are describing something drier than the word suggests —
Row 4. What was within arm's reach. Trees, a garden bed, a wall, a road, livestock, standing water, nothing at all The organic half of the smell is whatever was on that ground, and the mineral half is the local geology. This row is the reason two fields a kilometre apart do not smell alike, and it is also the row that tells a maker whether you want anything green in the composition at all —
Row 5. The exclusions. Three things that must not be in it - and be specific, since this row is the one that protects you A brief phrased as absences is checkable against a note list in seconds; a brief phrased as presences is not. Most readers in this family find that heavy resin, a sweet amber base and a loud musk belong in this row, which is covered in full on the exclusion page —
Row 6. Where and how you will wear it. Daily, occasionally, in heat, in an office, only at home An oil attar is a skin scent that stays close for the hours it occupies, so a composition you will wear in a lift every morning and one you will wear alone on a balcony are different briefs. This row also quietly rules out anything you would not actually put on —
Row 7. The format. An oil attar, a modern perfume oil, a spray, or something for a room rather than a wrist Format decides which makers you should even be writing to. A traditional distillate is an oil and nothing else; a modern wet-ground composition is usually an oil or a spray; and if the answer is a room, this entire family is pointed away from you and a personal fragrance range cannot help at all —
Row 8. The ceiling. The most you will spend - and the honest figure from SOSA, written in by me, is ₹0 Every brief needs a ceiling stated before shopping rather than discovered during it. Mine is zero because no row above is answerable from this range, and a number with a rupee sign in it would wrongly imply that some fraction of the brief is purchasable here. No fraction of it is —
Print it, copy it into an email, or just answer the eight in a note on your phone. The format matters less than the fact that the answers are written rather than felt, because written answers can be tested against a listing and a feeling cannot. Row one is worth settling first on the four-substrate page, and if your answer there is open ground then the translation page supplies the material names row one needs.

The row almost everybody omits, and why it cannot be left out

Row two is the one I would fight for if I could only keep one, and it is specific to this material. For a flower, the time of day changes the air rather than the subject: the same blossom reads greener in the morning and fleshier after dark, and a composition can sit at one point on that curve and still be recognisably the flower. Wet ground does not behave like that. It is not a thing with a daily rhythm; it is an event with a beginning, a middle and an end, and the smell at each stage comes from a different source.

In the first minutes, the dominant smell is the release from the ground as the surface wets, lifted by the sudden humidity, with the dust that had been lying there pushed into the air along with it. That is the mineral, slightly sweet, slightly dusty burst that most readers mean when they say the smell of rain. It does not last. As the ground saturates, the release flattens and what is left is the smell of wet things rather than of wetting: wet leaves, wet bark, wet stone, standing water, and in a city wet concrete and wet road. An hour in, the mineral burst has gone entirely and the composition of the air is largely vegetation. By evening it is vegetation and wood with almost no soil character in it at all.

The consequence is blunt. A reader who remembers the first ten minutes and a reader who remembers the whole wet evening will reject each other's products. The first needs a composition whose interesting part is early and mineral and who must accept that it will be the shortest-lived part of the wear. The second needs something green and tannic and persistent, and would find a mineral composition thin and strange. No brief that leaves row two blank can route between those two people, which is why a seller handed a brief without it will guess, and will guess wrong about half the time.

How to read your own answers once they are written down

Two readings, in this order. The first tells you which market you are in; the second tells you whether anybody is in it. Both are things you can do yourself with the brief in front of you, and neither requires anybody's opinion.

1
Read rows one and two together and name the market
The pair decides the product category before any brand is considered
Put row one and row two side by side and read them as a single phrase: open ground in the first ten minutes, stone an hour in, leaves all evening, timber all evening. That phrase names the product category rather than a brand, which is the level at which this decision is actually made. Open ground in the first minutes points at either a traditional distillate for the dry mineral half or a modern composition for the wet lift, which is the head-to-head on the comparison page. Stone in any minute points at a cool mineral composition and away from this family altogether. Leaves or timber all evening points at green and woody compositions that have nothing to do with soil and are far better stocked than anything in rows one to four. Naming the category first means you never have to compare across categories, which is the comparison that cannot be scored.
The useful consequence: most readers discover at this step that they have been shopping in the wrong category for months, which is a cheap discovery when it is made on paper.
2
Read rows five to eight as a veto list
The last four rows do not describe what you want; they eliminate what you would not accept
Rows one to four are a description and rows five to eight are a filter, and the filter is the half that saves money. Take any listing and run it against rows five to eight before you read a word of its romance: does it contain any of your exclusions, is it a format you will actually wear, will it work in the context you named, and is it under your ceiling. Most things fail at row five, which is why the exclusions matter more than the description. And when you reach row eight, remember what my own entry in it says: this range answers no row of this brief, so a listing of mine passing the filter is not a thing that can happen. If you find yourself wanting to relax one of rows five to eight in order to let something through, that is the moment to stop, because a relaxed veto is how a brief turns into a purchase it was written to prevent.
What to do with a brief that eliminates everything: treat it as a result. Eleven products eliminated and none standing is eleven purchases avoided, and the brief stays valid for years.
SOSA makes no petrichor or wet-earth composition, so the ceiling row of this brief reads ₹0 and nothing of mine answers any other row. The brief has eight rows: the surface, the minute of the event, the season and the dryness before it, what was within arm's reach, three exclusions, the wearing context, the format and the ceiling. Rows one and two do most of the work, because the surface decides which of four smells you mean and the minute decides whether you want the mineral burst or the wet evening. Flip: rows five to eight are a veto list rather than a description, and a brief that eliminates everything has done its job rather than failed.
If you are filling this in on somebody else's behalf - a gift for a parent who grew up in a landscape you have never stood in, a present for a partner whose childhood monsoon happened eight hundred kilometres from yours - the method stops working and I would rather tell you now than let you complete eight rows of guesswork. Rows one, two and four are unanswerable by anyone except the person who was there. The mineral half of the smell is the geology under their feet, the organic half is what was growing beside them, and the minute of the event is a thing they remember and you do not. A brief filled in from affection rather than from memory produces a confident, detailed and wrong document, which is worse than no brief at all because a seller will act on it. The honest move for a gift is to hand the brief to the person it is for and let them fill it in, or to buy something else entirely and keep this family out of it.
— the condition that changes this answer

What to do with the finished brief, since it does not come to me

Send it to people. Three emails with eight rows attached will teach you more in a week than a month of browsing, because a maker can read a brief and reply in a sentence while an index can only return things that share adjectives with it. Ask each of them one question in addition to the brief: which row they cannot answer. The row they name tells you where the real constraint in this material sits, and when three separate makers name the same row you have learned something that no amount of reading would have told you.

Then keep the brief. This is the part readers skip and it is the one that pays off latest and best. A written brief does not expire: the surface, the minute and the exclusions will be the same in three years, and the thing that answers them may not exist yet or may simply not have crossed your path. Readers who keep a brief recognise the right bottle immediately when they finally meet it, often in somebody else's house, and buy it without hesitating. Readers who shop from a feeling meet the same bottle and are not sure. That difference is the only lasting thing I can give you on a page where my own entry in row eight is zero.

Sonal’s recommendation
Fill in eight rows, send them to three makers, and keep the document - my own row reads ₹0
This is the only page in the family that produces an object rather than a verdict, and the object is a piece of paper. I would rather hand you a document that works on everybody than a bottle that works on nobody.
— Sonal Sahani, founder and perfumer, ISIPCA Versailles-trained
What to buy from SOSA for this Nothing. ₹0, written into row eight of the brief itself so that no reader completes the form expecting a bottle at the end of it
The two rows that matter most The surface - earth, stone, leaves or timber - and the minute of the event. Those two name the product category before any brand is considered
The row almost everybody omits The minute. The first ten minutes of rain is mineral and lifted; an evening of it is wet vegetation and wood. A brief without that row will be guessed at, and guessed wrong about half the time
The row that saves the money The exclusions. A brief phrased as absences can be checked against a note list in seconds, which is why it eliminates most of a shortlist before romance gets a chance
What to do with the finished brief Send it to three makers and ask each which row they cannot answer. When all three name the same row, you have found the real constraint in this material
What success looks like Often an empty shortlist, and a document you still have in two years. Readers with a written brief recognise the right thing instantly when they finally meet it
The reason I am willing to spend a long page on a form is that a brief is the one thing in this family that keeps its value when the answer is no. A recommendation dies the moment the product is wrong for you. A brief survives, travels, and gets sharper as you learn which rows people can and cannot answer. My entry in row eight is zero and I expect it to stay zero, and I would still rather you left with the document than with anything I could sell you.
Eight rows and a zero in the last one. Which row are you least sure of?
The brief is only as good as its first row, and the first row is the one readers have never been asked. Neither route below ends at a product of mine.
Settle row one first
You are not certain whether you mean earth, stone, leaves or timber. Then start there rather than here, because every other row is read in the light of that one and a brief with the wrong surface in it will be answered accurately and uselessly by everybody you send it to.
Have the finished brief read
You have filled in all eight and want a straight answer. Send it to me and I will tell you which rows anybody can answer, which rows nobody can, and what sort of maker to approach - and I will tell you plainly that the answer from my own range is the zero already written into row eight.
SS
ISIPCA
Versailles
A note from Sonal

The form on this page started as something I wrote for myself, not for readers. I was answering so many letters about this smell that I built a list of questions to ask before replying, because without them every answer I gave was a guess dressed up as expertise. The list got shorter and sharper over about a year, and the row that survived every edit was the one about the minute of the event, which I had not thought to ask at all for the first several months and which turned out to split my correspondents almost exactly in half.

What I did not expect was how often the brief ends in nothing, and how well readers take it. A document that eliminates everything feels like a failure when you are writing it and reads as a relief when you receive it, because the alternative was not a successful purchase - the alternative was another bottle that was almost right. Several people have written back to say they have the brief saved and have not bought anything in a year and are not bothered, which is the single most encouraging feedback this series has produced and also, I notice, commercially useless.

So this is the page where I put a zero in my own last row, in print, before the reader has filled in anything. It is the honest figure. Nothing in my four attars or my six perfume oils answers a single row above it, and a form that led to a product link would have been the easiest thing in the world to write and the one I would least want to defend. Fill in the eight rows and send them to me and you will get a straight reading of which rows are answerable by anybody, with nothing of mine attached to it.

Frequently asked questions

What belongs in a brief for a wet-earth or petrichor fragrance?
Eight rows, of which only two are adjectives. The surface you were standing on, the minute of the event, the season and how dry it had been, what was growing or standing within arm's reach, three things that must be absent, where and how you will wear it, the format you want, and a price ceiling. Written out, those eight let a maker answer in one line. Handed a memory instead, the same maker can only send you a catalogue and hope.
Why does the minute of the rain matter more than the time of day?
Because wet-ground smell is a sequence rather than a daily rhythm. In the first minutes the dominant smell is the release from the ground as the surface wets, lifted by sudden humidity and carrying the dust that was lying there. As the ground saturates that release flattens, and what remains is the smell of wet things rather than of wetting: wet leaves, wet bark, wet stone, standing water. A reader remembering the first ten minutes and a reader remembering the whole evening will reject each other's products.
What should go in the exclusions row?
Whatever you would refuse to wear, phrased as plainly as possible. For most readers in this family it is heavy resin, a sweet amber base and a loud persistent musk, because those three are what a perfumer reaches for to make a fragile damp impression last and they are what the composition eventually becomes. The value of the row is that absences are checkable against a note list in seconds, while a description of what you want is not checkable at all.
Does any SOSA product answer a row of this brief?
No. There is no soil, clay, dust, rain or wet-stone composition in the four attars or the six perfume oils, so no row of the brief is answerable from the range and the ceiling row is written as zero rather than as a price. That figure is in the form itself rather than in a footnote, because the worst version of a page like this walks a reader through eight careful questions and then produces a product link at the end.
Is it worth filling in a brief if it ends up eliminating everything?
Yes, and in this family that is the commonest outcome. The rows exist to be tested rather than satisfied, so a brief that eliminates eleven products and leaves none standing has prevented eleven purchases and cost nothing but an evening. A written brief also keeps its value: the surface, the minute and the exclusions will be the same in three years, and readers who hold one recognise the right bottle instantly when they finally meet it.
A recommendation dies the moment the product turns out to be wrong for you. A brief survives, travels and gets sharper as you learn which rows people can and cannot answer - which is why the only thing worth producing on a page like this is a document rather than a purchase.
— Sonal Sahani, SOSA
Eight rows you can hand to anybody, and a zero written into the last one
SOSA — The Wet-Ground Brief the artefact this family can honestly produce, and no bottle at the end
SOSA makes no petrichor attar, no wet-earth composition and nothing of soil, clay, dust, rain or wet stone, so no row of this brief is answerable from the range and its ceiling row is written as zero. The brief has eight rows: the surface, the minute of the event, the season and the dryness before it, what was within arm's reach, three exclusions, the wearing context, the format and the ceiling. The four SOSA attars are jasmine, rose, night-floral and oud compositions at ₹379 to ₹399 for 3ml, alcohol-free and DPG-free on a sandalwood and jojoba carrier, 6-8 hours on skin, and none of them answers any row above.
Ask SOSA to match a memory → SOSA Mastani Attar · ₹389
Continue the read
More from SOSA
Editorial standards & sources
About this guide: Written by Sonal Sahani, ISIPCA Versailles-trained founder and perfumer at SOSA Home & Body. It is written for a reader who knows the feeling they want and not the notes; the method of translating a place, a memory or a feeling into a fragrance family applies to any brand, and the product recommendations reflect the SOSA attar range only.

Facts verified 16 October 2026 against the live SOSA product pages: every SOSA attar is an alcohol-free, DPG-free oil perfume carried on sandalwood and jojoba oil with a built-in dab applicator, hand-blended in Pune, sold in 3ml, 6ml and 12ml, and described by SOSA as wearing 6-8 hours on skin - longer on warm or oily skin, and always as a skin scent rather than a room scent. SOSA Adaa (3ml ₹379 · 6ml ₹669 · 12ml ₹1,149) is the lightest in the range: Calabrian bergamot, green cardamom and neroli over jasmine sambac, magnolia and ylang ylang, on white musk, vetiver and cedarwood. SOSA Ameeri (₹385 · ₹679 · ₹1,165) is Persian saffron, pink pepper and bergamot over Taif rose and Indian sandalwood, on soft oudh, amber and white musk. SOSA Mastani (₹389 · ₹685 · ₹1,179) is litchi, bergamot and pink pepper over night-blooming jasmine and Damask rose, on Mysore sandalwood, oudh, Madagascar vanilla and tonka. SOSA Nawaab (₹399 · ₹699 · ₹1,199) is the deepest in the range: white royal oud, Mysore sandalwood, Kashmir saffron and aged tobacco leaf on amber, leather and white musk. The three evening attars come together as the SOSA Attar Trio (₹1,055 · ₹1,859 · ₹3,189). The four attars above are the whole attar range, and it contains no mitti or petrichor attar, no tuberose or rajnigandha, no champa or champak, no khus or vetiver soliflore, no marigold, no pine or conifer, no moss, no coffee and no clean-linen or aldehydic accord. Vetiver and cedarwood exist only as base notes inside Adaa, and sandalwood runs through the carrier of all four. Where a reader asks for a material SOSA does not make, these pages say so plainly and do not offer a substitute as though it were the thing asked for. Separately from the attars, SOSA makes six perfume oils in 10ml, 50ml and 100ml - Zaffran, Tabac Noir, Samundar, Khayaal, Chashni and Bahaar - each an independent SOSA composition inspired by a widely known fragrance and not affiliated with, or endorsed by, the house named. Fragrance is a personal choice: SOSA makes no claim that any attar changes how others perceive, judge or respond to the wearer, no claim about attraction, confidence, mood, sleep, stress or wellbeing, and no medical, dermatological or allergy claim - anyone with sensitive skin or a fragrance allergy should patch-test and consult their own judgement or a doctor. Wear time and projection vary with skin, climate and application. A portion of every SOSA order supports girl-child education through Nanhi Kali. Prices and availability are subject to change - see the live product pages.
ブログに戻る