Founder Diaries · Scent Memories · Flowers, Rain, Earth, Forests
By Sonal Sahani · ISIPCA Versailles 21 min read Updated October 2026
There is no champa or champak in my range in any form, so my figure on this page is ₹0 and I will not offer you a creamy white floral of mine as a near miss. You have probably already read the correction - that the blossom and the smoky resin accord sold under a similar name are two unrelated things - and you have discovered the irritating part: knowing it changes nothing about what your search returns.
The separation page owns that distinction and the resin itself, and I have not restated either. What this page owns is the practical consequence nobody writes about: the market's indexing follows the market's error, so the fix is not a better belief but a different query. Four of them, one for each thing readers mean by the word, built from facet vocabulary instead of a flower's name. None of the four leads back to me.
Quick answers — read this first
Which SOSA champa attar smells like the real flower rather than the incense version? Neither exists here. There is no champa or champak in the range as an attar, a perfume oil, a note or a facet, so my recommendation is ₹0 and I would rather lose the sale than take ₹379 from a reader expecting a courtyard tree. Adaa does hold magnolia in its heart beside a jasmine, and I am naming that only to rule it out: magnolia is a different flower and this page offers it as a substitute for nothing.
Why do I keep being shown the incense version when I search for the flower? Because search indexing follows usage, and in this category usage is the error. Overwhelmingly more products, descriptions and reviews attach the word to the resin-based incense accord than to the blossom, so the word itself now points there. A reader who has corrected their belief and not their query will be shown the same results they were shown before. The fix has to be a different search, built from the facets of the smell rather than the name of the flower.
What should I type instead? It depends which of four smells you mean, and the page below gives a specification for each. Broadly: for the blossom, search facet words - creamy, lactonic, banana-ester, magnolia-adjacent, fruity white floral - and never the flower's name. For the incense, search the resin and the format. For the sweetened commercial floral, search the sweetener. For the cool magnolia-like register, search magnolia. Four smells, four queries, and no overlap between them.
The short answer
Short answer: Buy nothing from SOSA for this. There is no champa or champak anywhere in the range, so the honest version of this page has no product in it and the useful part is the query. Correcting your belief does not change your results, because indexing follows usage and in this category usage is the error - the word now points at the resin-based incense accord because that is what most listings, reviews and descriptions attach it to. So the fix is a different search: drop the flower's name entirely and build the query from facet words, which are the only terms that discriminate between the four things readers mean.
The pick: ₹0 from me, and none of the four corrected queries leads back here. Read
the separation page first if you have not, then use whichever of the four specifications below matches the smell you actually mean, and read results with the flower's name treated as noise rather than as a signal.
Next step: run your corrected query, then apply one filter to the results: discard any listing where the only place a specific material is named is the title.
The vocabulary page ranks the four smells by how answerable each one is, which is the next thing to know once you have a working query. Or
describe the smell to me in your own words and I will write the query for you, with no bottle of mine attached to the answer.
What I do not make, said plainly
SOSA makes no champa or champak of any kind, in any product, at any size. Not as an attar, not as one of the six perfume oils, not as a heart note, not as a base note and not as a passing facet. The four attars are a jasmine composition, a Taif rose and Indian sandalwood composition, a night-jasmine and Damask rose composition, and an oud composition. Adaa's heart holds magnolia and ylang ylang beside its jasmine, and because a creamy white-floral adjective is the exact bridge a reader of this page might build, I will say it flatly: magnolia is a different flower, and nothing of mine is a version of the one in the title. Said once, and now the queries.
Straight answer
I want an attar that smells like the real flower rather than the incense version - which compositions should I explore, and what should I search for?
None of mine, and the thing worth your next four minutes is not a product but a query - because the reason you keep seeing the wrong results is that you corrected your belief and left your search term alone. First, why this is a different problem from the one you thought you had. Most readers arrive here having already made the discovery: the blossom they remember from a courtyard is creamy, fruity, faintly banana-like, nothing whatever to do with the smoky stick-incense accord sold under a similar name.
The separation page sets that out properly and owns the resin behind it, and I am not going to re-explain any of it. What nobody tells you is what happens next. You go back to the search box, you type the same word with your newly corrected understanding, and you are shown the same products as before, because the search box does not know you have learned something.
Second, how a word gets captured. A search engine or a marketplace matches your query against the text that exists, weighted by how often it appears and how people behave around it. In this category the text that exists is overwhelmingly about the resin accord and not about any flower: more products bear the name, more descriptions repeat it, more reviews echo it, and more people who typed it clicked and were satisfied. From the index's point of view that is not an error - it is a strong, consistent signal about what the word means to the people who use it. The word has been captured by the majority usage, and your minority usage is invisible to it. No amount of being right changes that.
Third, the consequence, which is the single most useful thing on this page. You cannot fix a captured word by using it more precisely. You fix it by not using it. Build your query out of the facets of the smell instead, because facet vocabulary has not been captured - no burning stick is ever sold as lactonic, and no fruity white blossom is ever described as resinous. Facet words discriminate, and the flower's name no longer does. This is why the four specifications below contain none of them.
Fourth, why four queries rather than one. Because the word covers four different smells and readers do not all mean the same one. There is the living blossom - creamy, fruity, faintly banana-and-magnolia. There is the resin-based incense accord, which is a genuine and much-loved thing and simply a different subject. There is the sweetened commercial floral sold under the name in a great many shops, which is neither of the first two. And there is the cool, lemony, magnolia-adjacent register that some readers mean when they describe the tree rather than the flower. A query that works for one of those will fail for the others, which is why a single corrected search term does not exist and I am not going to pretend one does.
The vocabulary page ranks the four by how answerable each one is.
Fifth, the correction that runs the other way, said now rather than buried. A real proportion of readers who work through this discover that the thing they loved was the incense after all - that the memory is a doorway, a temple corridor, a shop, a particular stick burning in a particular room, rather than a tree. If that is you, your original search term was right all along, and I want to be clear that this is not a lesser outcome or a failure of discernment. It is simply a different answer, it is far easier to buy than the blossom, and I am the wrong seller for it either way because there is no resin or smoke register anywhere in my range.
Sixth, what a corrected query still cannot do. It will return fewer wrong results and it will not return only right ones, because facet words can be used decoratively by anyone. So the query is step one and reading the results is step two, and the second step has its own two filters, which are in the middle of this page. Together they get you from several hundred results to a handful worth paying for.
And last, the reason none of this routes back to me, stated plainly so that you can trust the rest. There is no champa in my range, there is no incense register in my range, and the magnolia in one of my hearts is a different flower doing a different job beside a jasmine. I have nothing to sell you on this page, which is precisely why I can tell you what to type. A brand with a bottle in this category would be writing you a query that led to its own shelf, and you would be right to discount every word of it.
How a word gets captured, and why your results did not change when your mind did
It is worth understanding the mechanism rather than just the workaround, because the same thing happens with half a dozen Indian fragrance words and you will meet it again.
A search index is a description of usage, not a dictionary. It records which documents contain which words, how often, in what company, and what people did after clicking. When a word is used by a large majority to mean one thing and by a small minority to mean another, the index does not hold two meanings in balance - it holds the majority meaning, with the minority appearing as faint noise far down the results. This is not a flaw introduced by anyone's bad faith. It is the index working correctly on the text it was given.
So the asymmetry in this category is self-reinforcing. Because most products bearing the name are the resin accord rather than any flower, most descriptions using the name describe that accord; because readers searching the name are shown those products and buy them, the association strengthens; and because the blossom is rarely offered, nobody has an incentive to write text that would compete for the word. A reader who learns the distinction is correcting a belief in a system that does not hold beliefs. The only lever they have is the vocabulary of their query, and the good news is that it is a strong lever, because the facet words have been left alone. Nobody has had a reason to capture lactonic.
The four corrected search specifications, one for each smell readers mean
Here are the four, as specifications rather than as single phrases, because a usable query is a small set of terms plus an exclusion. The left column is the smell as you would describe it from memory. The right column is what to type and what to leave out, and in every row the flower's name is left out.
The four corrected queries
What you mean, and what to put in the search box so that the box can find it
| The smell you actually mean |
The query specification - and the flower's name appears in none of them |
|
The living blossom from a courtyard tree. Creamy and thick, distinctly fruity, with something close to ripe banana in it, and a cool white-flower edge underneath. Sweet without sugar. Nothing smoky anywhere in it.
|
Search facets, not the flower. Terms to combine: creamy white floral, lactonic, banana ester, fruity jasmine, magnolia-adjacent, tropical white flower. Add absolute or oil to bias towards material-led sellers. Exclude: incense, resin, agarbatti, masala, smoke, dhoop. The exclusions do more work than the inclusions. |
|
The burning stick in a doorway or a corridor. Smoky, resinous, sweetish, faintly powdery, with a thickness that coats the air rather than the skin. Strongly associated with a place rather than with a plant.
|
Search the resin and the format. Terms to combine: the resin by name, dhoop, masala incense, hand-rolled, smoke accord, sweet balsamic. If you want it as a wearable rather than as a stick, add fragrance oil and balsamic, and expect a composition rather than a distillate. No flower word is needed anywhere in this query. |
|
The sweetened shop floral sold under the name. Pleasant, soapy-sweet, generically pretty, with a vanillic or powdery finish and no fruit and no green. Most readers have met this one without knowing it was a third thing.
|
Search the sweetener, and decide whether you want it. Terms: sweet floral oil, powdery floral, vanillic white floral, soft musk floral. This is a real category, widely made and inexpensive, and perfectly good if it is what you want. The honest move is to search it as what it is rather than looking for it under a flower's name. |
|
The cool, lemony, magnolia-like register - the tree rather than the blossom. Lighter, greener, with a citrus-peel edge and a slight metallic coolness, and far less of the creaminess the blossom has.
|
Search magnolia directly. Terms: magnolia, champaca-free magnolia accord, citrus white floral, cool floral, green magnolia. This is the one query in the four where naming a flower works, because magnolia has not been captured by anything. Exclude sweet, vanilla and gourmand terms. |
Four queries, no overlap, and one of them contains a flower's name only because that particular flower's name still means what it says. Notice how much of the work the exclusion terms do: in the first row the exclusions are more decisive than the inclusions, because the thing standing between you and the blossom is not scarcity of good listings but abundance of a different product. The wearing-test page is what to read once you have candidates, because it compares how each behaves on skin at ten minutes and at three hours.
Two filters to apply to the results, because a better query still returns noise
A corrected query returns fewer wrong answers rather than only right ones, since facet words can be used decoratively by anybody. Two filters cut the remainder down to something you could spend money on, and both take seconds.
1
Filter one: is the facet word placed, or merely sprinkled?
A facet word in a pyramid is a claim; the same word in a headline is an adjective
Your query found listings containing words like creamy and lactonic. Now check where those words sit. If the listing places them - a stated top, heart and base, with the creamy material named in the heart - the word is part of a structural claim that the first wear will confirm or contradict. If the word appears only in a headline or a block of atmospheric copy, it was keyword work and tells you nothing about the composition. This is the same test that works on any floral listing anywhere, and it is especially necessary after a facet-based search, because facet vocabulary is exactly what a seller optimising for your corrected query would reach for. The arms race is real, and placement is the thing that is expensive to fake.
The quickest version: find the pyramid before you read the prose. If there is no pyramid at all, treat the listing as unscored rather than as promising, however well its adjectives match your query.
2
Filter two: does the listing distinguish the four itself?
A seller who separates the blossom from the burning stick in their own copy is telling you which one they sell
This filter is unusually powerful in this category and almost free to run. Because the confusion is so widespread, a seller who has actually worked with the blossom will very often address it directly - a sentence saying this is the flower and not the stick, or naming the resin in order to distance themselves from it. That sentence costs them nothing to write and nobody writes it unless they know the distinction matters, so it is close to a signature of a material-led seller. Conversely, a listing that uses the name loosely across both meanings in the same paragraph has told you it is not tracking the difference, which means it cannot reliably be selling you the side of it you want. Neither reading is proof. Both are cheap, and in a category this muddled, cheap signals are what you have.
What silence means here: not dishonesty, usually, but indifference to the distinction - and a seller indifferent to the distinction will sell you whichever one their supplier sent, which is a coin toss you are paying for.
SOSA makes no champa or champak in any form, so the figure on this page is ₹0 and the magnolia in Adaa's heart is a different flower rather than a substitute. The correction that matters is to your query, not to your belief: drop the flower's name, build the search from facet words - creamy white floral, lactonic, banana ester, magnolia-adjacent - and exclude incense, resin and smoke terms. Then filter the results by whether the facet word is placed in a pyramid. Flip: if the smell you loved turns out to be the burning stick, your original search term was right all along, and that is a different answer rather than a worse one.
If, having read the separation, you conclude that the thing you loved was the incense after all - the corridor, the shop doorway, the stick burning in a particular room rather than any tree - then the correction runs entirely the other way and your original search term was correct from the start. I want to say clearly that this is not a lesser outcome. It is a genuine and widely loved smell, it is easier to buy than the blossom, and the second row of the table above is your specification rather than the first. What does not change is my part in it: there is no resin, smoke or incense register anywhere in my range either, so SOSA is the wrong seller whichever of the two you turn out to want, and I would rather be the wrong seller twice over than route you to a magnolia.
— the condition that changes this answer
What I would do instead, and the three compositions of mine I am ruling out
Two parts, as on every refusal in this series. First the three bottles of mine a reader with this question builds a case for, each named and each ruled out. Then what I would do, which involves a search box rather than my shop.
The three I am ruling out, and the bridge each one invites
The creamy white-floral adjective is shared by a dozen unrelated flowers, which is precisely why a vague refusal would not hold and these three need naming
| Composition |
What it actually is |
Why it is not an answer to the flower in this title |
What I would charge you for this memory |
SOSA Adaa Attar
|
A jasmine-led composition - Calabrian bergamot, green cardamom and neroli over jasmine sambac, magnolia and ylang ylang, on white musk, vetiver and cedarwood |
This is the bridge everybody builds, and the materials make it tempting: magnolia and ylang ylang in the heart give a creamy, slightly fruity white-floral reading, and the word creamy is the word readers of this page use. An adjective in common is not a flower in common. Magnolia is the fourth row of my own table - a cool, lemony register - and it is not the blossom you remember |
₹0 for this. It is ₹379 for 3ml if you want it as the jasmine composition it is View →
|
SOSA Nawaab Attar
|
The deepest attar in the range - white royal oud, Mysore sandalwood, Kashmir saffron and aged tobacco leaf on amber, leather and white musk |
The second bridge belongs to the readers who decided they wanted the smoky side instead, and who then reach for the darkest thing I make. Aged tobacco leaf is a cured leaf and leather is an animal register; neither is resin and neither is smoke from a burning stick. If the corridor is what you want, this is the wrong direction with conviction |
₹0 for this. It is ₹399 for 3ml if you want the deepest thing I make, on its own terms View →
|
SOSA Mastani Attar
|
A night-jasmine and Damask rose composition on Mysore sandalwood, oudh, Madagascar vanilla and tonka |
The third bridge is the sweetened one: a reader who has quietly settled for the third row of my table - the sweet shop floral - will find this the nearest thing, because vanilla and tonka are genuinely sweet materials. It is still a jasmine and a rose rather than the flower in the title, and I would rather you bought the third row knowingly from somebody who sells it as that |
₹0 for this. It is ₹389 for 3ml as the night floral it is View →
|
Three rows and three different bridges: one by adjective, one by darkness, one by sweetness. The figure is the same in all three, and I have written them out because the first row in particular is the single likeliest bad purchase anywhere in this family of pages. The creamy white-floral adjective is doing all the work and it is doing it dishonestly - not because anybody lied, but because one word is describing two unrelated flowers. For the one page in this family where my own answer is genuinely a bottle,
the mogra comparison page is it.
Sonal’s recommendation
Buy nothing from me, drop the flower's name from your search, and build the query out of facets instead
I have nothing in this category and no resin register either, which is the only reason I can be trusted to tell you what to type. A query written by a brand that had a bottle in the race would lead to that bottle.
— Sonal Sahani, founder and perfumer, ISIPCA Versailles-trained
| What to buy from SOSA for this |
Nothing. ₹0, the figure and not a gesture. The flower is absent from the range in every role, and the magnolia in Adaa's heart is a different flower doing a different job |
| The first thing to change |
Your query, not your belief. Remove the flower's name entirely: it has been captured by the majority usage and no amount of using it accurately will make the index understand you |
| What to type instead |
Facet words. For the blossom: creamy white floral, lactonic, banana ester, fruity jasmine, magnolia-adjacent. And the exclusions, which matter more - no incense, resin, dhoop, masala or smoke terms |
| How to read the results |
Find the pyramid before the prose, and check whether the facet word is placed in it. A facet word in a headline is keyword work; the same word in a stated heart is a claim the first wear will test |
| The free signal to look for |
A seller who separates the blossom from the stick in their own copy. Nobody writes that sentence unless they know the difference matters, and it costs them nothing, which makes it an unusually honest tell |
| What I would like you to take away |
That a captured word cannot be fixed by using it more precisely - only by not using it. That applies to half a dozen Indian fragrance words and you will meet it again |
The sentence I will not write is the easy one:
we do not make this flower, but Adaa's magnolia heart is beautifully creamy. It is true and it would mislead you within a minute of the bottle opening, because creamy is a word shared by unrelated flowers and you came here with a specific tree. So the figure is ₹0 in all three rows. What I would genuinely like is for you to run the corrected query, find something, and tell me whether it was the blossom or the corridor you had been missing -
the vocabulary page was built out of exactly those replies.
Four smells wear the same word. Which of them is yours?
Two readers arrive here at different stages, and neither of them is buying anything from me today.
Read the separation first
You are not yet certain which of the four you are remembering. Then a query will not help, because you will not know which specification to use. Settle the separation first - what the blossom is, what the resin accord is, and why the two got welded together - and come back for the queries.
Send Sonal the smell in your own words
You know the smell and cannot find the words for it. Describe the place, the time of day and whether there was any smoke in the air, and I will write the query for you and name the facet terms to exclude - with no bottle of mine attached to the answer, because I have none to attach.
A note from Sonal
I noticed the indexing problem by making it myself. For about a year I would answer these messages by carefully explaining the distinction, feeling rather pleased with the explanation, and then readers would write back a week later to say they had searched again and been shown exactly the same products. I had corrected their understanding and left them in precisely the same position as before, which is a slightly humiliating thing to realise about your own helpfulness. The explanation was necessary and it was not sufficient.
What changed my approach was thinking about search boxes as records of usage rather than as dictionaries. A word is captured by whoever uses it most, and in this category that is settled by a very wide margin. So the practical route is to stop fighting for the word and step around it, into vocabulary nobody has had a reason to capture. The facet terms are still clean. They will not stay clean forever - sellers read pages like this one - which is why the two filters in the middle of this page matter as much as the queries themselves.
And the refusal, once, plainly. I have neither of the two main things readers come to this page wanting, and the creamy magnolia in one of my hearts is a different flower. Forty-six other pages in this hundred end the same way, and I would rather publish a page that sends you to somebody else with a working query than one that sends you to my own shelf with a disappointment attached. Describe the place to me - the courtyard or the corridor - and I will tell you which of the four specifications is yours.
Frequently asked questions
Does SOSA make a champa or champak attar?
No. There is no champa or champak in the SOSA range in any form, as an attar, one of the six perfume oils, a heart note, a base note or a passing facet. The four attars are a jasmine composition, a Taif rose and Indian sandalwood composition, a night-jasmine and Damask rose composition and an oud composition. Adaa holds magnolia in its heart beside a jasmine, and magnolia is a different flower rather than a version of the one in this page's title. The recommendation here is zero.
Why does correcting my understanding not change my search results?
Because a search index records usage rather than definitions. It matches your query against the text that exists, weighted by frequency and by what people clicked on afterwards. In this category the great majority of products, descriptions and reviews attach the name to the resin-based incense accord, so the word now points there as a strong and consistent signal. The index holds no beliefs for you to correct, so using the word more accurately produces the same results as using it loosely.
What should I search for if I want the living blossom rather than the incense?
Facet words, and no flower name at all. Combine creamy white floral, lactonic, banana ester, fruity jasmine, magnolia-adjacent and tropical white flower, and add absolute or oil to bias towards material-led sellers. Then add the exclusions, which do more work than the inclusions: no incense, resin, dhoop, masala or smoke terms. The reason is that facet vocabulary has not been captured by the majority usage, so it still discriminates between the four things readers mean.
How do I tell whether a facet word in a listing is a real claim?
Check where it sits. A facet word placed inside a stated pyramid - the creamy material named in the heart, with a top and a base around it - is a structural claim that the first wear will confirm or contradict. The same word in a headline or in a block of atmospheric copy is keyword work and says nothing about the composition. This filter matters especially after a facet-based search, because facet vocabulary is exactly what a seller optimising for a corrected query would use.
What if the smell I actually loved was the incense?
Then your original search term was correct from the start, and that is a different answer rather than a worse one. The resin-based accord is a genuine and widely loved smell and it is considerably easier to buy than the blossom: search the resin by name, plus dhoop, masala incense, hand-rolled, smoke accord and sweet balsamic, and add fragrance oil if you want it as something wearable. SOSA is the wrong seller either way, because there is no resin, smoke or incense register anywhere in the range.
A captured word cannot be repaired by using it more carefully. The market's indexing follows the market's error, so the only fix available to a buyer is a different query - built out of facet vocabulary nobody has yet had a reason to capture.
— Sonal Sahani, SOSA
From a corrected belief that changed nothing to a query that actually works
SOSA — Four Smells, One Word the search-term correction, and why the belief was not enough
SOSA makes no champa or champak in any form, and this page recommends nothing from the range for it at any size. The useful correction is to the query rather than to the belief: indexing follows usage, and in this category usage attaches the name overwhelmingly to the resin-based incense accord, so the word no longer discriminates. Drop it, and build the search from facet vocabulary instead - creamy white floral, lactonic, banana ester, magnolia-adjacent - with incense, resin, dhoop and smoke terms excluded. Four smells wear the word and each needs its own specification. Then filter the results by whether the facet word is placed inside a stated pyramid. The four SOSA attars are jasmine, rose, night-floral and oud compositions at ₹379 to ₹399 for 3ml, alcohol-free and DPG-free on a sandalwood and jojoba carrier, 6-8 hours on skin.
Ask SOSA to match a memory → SOSA Adaa Attar · ₹379
Continue the read
More from SOSA
Editorial standards & sources
About this guide: Written by Sonal Sahani, ISIPCA Versailles-trained founder and perfumer at SOSA Home & Body. It is written for a reader who knows the feeling they want and not the notes; the method of translating a place, a memory or a feeling into a fragrance family applies to any brand, and the product recommendations reflect the SOSA attar range only.
Facts verified 16 October 2026 against the live SOSA product pages: every SOSA attar is an alcohol-free, DPG-free oil perfume carried on sandalwood and jojoba oil with a built-in dab applicator, hand-blended in Pune, sold in 3ml, 6ml and 12ml, and described by SOSA as wearing 6-8 hours on skin - longer on warm or oily skin, and always as a skin scent rather than a room scent.
SOSA Adaa (3ml ₹379 · 6ml ₹669 · 12ml ₹1,149) is the lightest in the range: Calabrian bergamot, green cardamom and neroli over jasmine sambac, magnolia and ylang ylang, on white musk, vetiver and cedarwood.
SOSA Ameeri (₹385 · ₹679 · ₹1,165) is Persian saffron, pink pepper and bergamot over Taif rose and Indian sandalwood, on soft oudh, amber and white musk.
SOSA Mastani (₹389 · ₹685 · ₹1,179) is litchi, bergamot and pink pepper over night-blooming jasmine and Damask rose, on Mysore sandalwood, oudh, Madagascar vanilla and tonka.
SOSA Nawaab (₹399 · ₹699 · ₹1,199) is the deepest in the range: white royal oud, Mysore sandalwood, Kashmir saffron and aged tobacco leaf on amber, leather and white musk. The three evening attars come together as the
SOSA Attar Trio (₹1,055 · ₹1,859 · ₹3,189). The four attars above are the whole attar range, and it contains no mitti or petrichor attar, no tuberose or rajnigandha, no champa or champak, no khus or vetiver soliflore, no marigold, no pine or conifer, no moss, no coffee and no clean-linen or aldehydic accord. Vetiver and cedarwood exist only as base notes inside Adaa, and sandalwood runs through the carrier of all four. Where a reader asks for a material SOSA does not make, these pages say so plainly and do not offer a substitute as though it were the thing asked for. Separately from the attars, SOSA makes six perfume oils in 10ml, 50ml and 100ml - Zaffran, Tabac Noir, Samundar, Khayaal, Chashni and Bahaar - each an independent SOSA composition inspired by a widely known fragrance and not affiliated with, or endorsed by, the house named. Fragrance is a personal choice: SOSA makes no claim that any attar changes how others perceive, judge or respond to the wearer, no claim about attraction, confidence, mood, sleep, stress or wellbeing, and no medical, dermatological or allergy claim - anyone with sensitive skin or a fragrance allergy should patch-test and consult their own judgement or a doctor. Wear time and projection vary with skin, climate and application. A portion of every SOSA order supports girl-child education through Nanhi Kali. Prices and availability are subject to change - see the live product pages.